• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

UNGASS ten years on

Background memo for the UNGASS 10-year review

Weaknesses in the United Nations drug control system have often been identified, related to the functioning of the key organs – the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), and the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) –, related to collaboration with the wider UN system – the World Health Organistaion (WHO), UNAIDS, UN Development Programme (UNDP), etc. – and related to the outdated character of several treaty provisions.

  • What has been attempted to date to achieve more structural reform?
  • Are existing evaluation mechanisms capable of bringing the need for reform to the table?

Tensions have arisen about the way the INCB performs its duties and about its legal interpretation of the conventions. INCB reports and letters have condemned policy practices that the concerned countries consider to be defendable. The conventions describe the Board’s mission explicitly in terms of co-operation and dialogue.

  • Is the INCB overstepping its mandate?
  • How could a neutral and evidence-based role of UNODC as a centre of expertise be strengthened?
  • How can these issues be related to the UN call for more ‘system-wide coherence’ and ‘delivery as one’?

Background

The international drug control system has been in continuous evolution since 1961. While the Single Convention focused on the cultivation of plants with narcotic properties, the 1971 Convention was created by the wish of the pharmaceutical companies to keep psychotropic drugs separate. The 1988 Convention introduced the crime of drug money laundering but also obliged member states to criminalise a wide range of drug-related activities.

In 1993, with all three conventions in place and with the expiry of the transitional period of 25 years established under the 1961 convention, a three-day high level meeting was held during the General Assembly. The tone was set by a letter from Mexico, which pointed out that that illicit cultivation was continuing, drug consumption had increased and criminal organisations were expanding. It made reference to a variety of issues such as precursors, money laundering and alternative development, and mentioned the need to review drug classification with reference to WHO, alluding to the possibility of cannabis being taken out of the conventions altogether. It also requested that more attention be given to the demand for drugs.

This marked the beginning of the move towards a ‘more balanced’ approach. The early 1990s was a period of increasing polarisation across the world. It was clear that the aims of the conventions had not been met and that the market was growing rather than shrinking. Tougher sanctions were imposed through a wave of repressive legislation. The message was, “the 1988 convention has teeth but now we have to make it bite”. At the same time many European countries were starting a harm reduction approach, and were applying more leniency with regard to cannabis. In the same period WHO had two research programmes running on coca issues and cannabis. The findings of these research projects were viewed with outrage by many governments.

INCB’s annual report for 1994 highlighted a number of outdated provisions and contradictions within the conventions. An advisory committee was set up to look at how the drug control system could be improved. It recommended that the status of coca and cannabis be re-examined, and suggested looking more closely at harm reduction and decriminalisation policies. However CND decided not to implement any of the recommendations of the advisory group and INCB’s list of recommendations to resolve the contradictions in the conventions was never acted on.

In the end the ‘reconsider’ lobby was neutralised. Some of Mexico’s concerns were eventually addressed at the 1998 UNGASS, when the principle of alternative development was accepted for the first time, and when a precursors action plan and the Guiding Principles on demand reduction were introduced.

With the 2008 UNGASS evaluation the dilemma is with us again : to reconsider or reaffirm. There has clearly been a stabilisation of the market, although ‘containment’ may not be the appropriate description. Harm reduction has become more widespread, largely due to HIV/AIDS, but prison populations have increased. Inside the broader UN system there has been a debate on UN reform and system wide coherence. With regard to drugs, inconsistencies have worsened. Several problems need to be addressed:

1. Harm reduction. Part of the UN (the larger part) uses the language and practice of harm reduction as a matter of course, whereas under pressure from the US, UNODC, INCB and CND do not.

2. UN coherence and responsibilities. There is more tension now between INCB and WHO over scheduling issues (eg over Khat, dronabinol/delta-9-THC) where WHO has the primary responsibility.

3. The tensions between the drug control treaties and practices and other UN treaties, principles and practices – for example human rights violations in the context of drug law enforcement. The UN drug agencies do nothing to prevent these.

4. The transparency of the UN drug control process and the associated NGO community. All UN agencies have established procedures for NGO participation and transparency of procedures, including the availability of documents, while the drug agencies still have a poor record in this regard.

Problem contained ?

The UNODCs Executive Director’s report on the UNGASS evaluation will almost certainly state that the drug consumption problem has been contained. It will be argued that most goals have been achieved, that there have been great advances in money laundering, in precursor legislation and in treatment availability. The truth is that
consumption has grown in countries where before it was insignificant. Containment is not a satisfactory answer, and patterns of consumption are very complex.

Colombian government officials acknowledge privately that current drug policies do not work, and at the 2008 CND Colombia may say that eradication is not a valid policy. Many Colombians think cocaine should be legalised. An alternative solution must be found, which should include a debate about causality and about why both coca and opium are concentrated in very few countries. If this is not done the errors of the past will be repeated.

Some 15 years ago the big Colombian cartels were destroyed. The new cartels were fragmented and they subcontracted out their armed services. Left and right wing paramilitary groups became involved. From being run by mafia-type drug lords, now the organisations are run by warlords who use funds to reinforce territorial control. This is not containment. Solving the problem has become much more difficult.

Data problems

The evaluation will try to focus on results, but UNODC’s data are very contradictory, and it can only use data provided by governments. If one takes the figures at face value Colombia has eradicated more coca cultivation than estimates of cultivation pre-eradication, so there should be none left. In Colombia every sprayed crop is
counted as eradicated, and this system leads to errors of double counting. The basis for the ‘containment’ conclusion is based on BRQ answers, but these cannot be trusted. UNODC does not have the capability to ensure that BRQs are properly completed, and has no means of knowing the basis on which answers are made. Responding countries do not use the same methodologies and there are wide inconsistencies. The mandate for the World Drug Report states that it should be ‘authoritative, objective and scientific’, but UNODC does not have enough staff to do serious statistical analysis.

The Expert Working Group seems to have concluded that the BRQ is not a good instrument and does not give a basis for impact assessment. On the positive side, it has caused a focus on demand reduction in countries where this did not exist before. One should be cautious in disparaging the BRQ because many countries will use this
as an excuse to do nothing.

UNODC, crime and terrorism

There is a tendency within UNODC to focus more on terrorism and to move drug issues into this field. If the shift continues UNODC will have a completely new dynamic: the name and organisational focus will shift towards terrorism, crime and drug control, because this is where the money is. While drug control should not be seen through primarily through a crime prism, the Crime Commission is strongly rooted in human rights issues, and this approach could be useful. The five-yearly crime congress could even be a model for meetings with a wider range of participants.

In the UK drugs is called a ‘cross cutter’ because it affects all parts of society and is seen through the different perspectives of young people, health and crime. A powerful coordination mechanism exists to resolve tensions between them. The problem is that in the UN system there is no such mechanism for drug control, but this could be a recommendation for 2008-9. Alternatively, rather than create a new inter-agency coordination body, UNODC could be asked to integrate WHO and UNAIDS expertise into its work and into CND meetings to a greater extent.

It is recommended that:

• The functioning and mandate of INCB be examined, and the boundaries of its mandate established;
• The mandate of WHO, which was largely taken away in the early 1990s, should be re-established and its authority at CND meetings reaffirmed.
• The capacity of UNODC to undertake statistical analysis should be strengthened.
• A study should be made of the relationship between UN drug control and other UN treaties, and of certain legal aspects of the conventions. The aim should be to bring more rationality and evidence into the debate.

  • Labels
    10-year Review | civil society | WHO | conventions | CND | UNODC | UNGASS | INCB | UN drug control

Drugs in the News

  • Canadian province experiments with decriminalising hard drugs
    31.01.2023
  • In the weeds: Germany's plan to legalise cannabis in 2024 likely delayed
    27.01.2023
  • Cannabis 'Harm Reduction' clubs can apply to sell home-grown drug from February
    27.01.2023
  • New Yorker jailed during ‘war on drugs’ becomes cannabis pioneer
    26.01.2023
  • Legalising cocaine would stem drug violence, Belgian criminologist suggests
    21.01.2023
  • Record 100 tonnes of cocaine seized in Port of Antwerp last year
    10.01.2023
More news

Weblog

    Germany: Flirting with Plan B?Germany: Flirting with Plan B?
    07.12.2022
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  36 afghanistan  24 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  36 afghanistan  24 hide
africa  11 albania  14 alternative development  120 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  88 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  103 austria  5 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  46 barbados  11 belgium  43 belize  10 bermuda  15 bolivia  116 brazil  93 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  44 california  212 cambodia  12 canada  527 cannabinoids  102 cannabis  3114 cannabis clubs  205 cannabis industry  398 caribbean  147 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  129 coca  216 cocaine  87 coffee shop  223 cognitive decline  30 colombia  155 colorado  162 compulsary detention  19 conflict  4 conventions  267 corporate capture  53 corruption  4 costa rica  10 crack  54 craft cannabis  30 crime  84 czech republic  41 dark net  4 death penalty  2 decertification  1 decriminalization  908 deforestation  8 denmark  123 drug checking  41 drug consumption rooms  192 drug courts  22 drug markets  142 drug policy index  2 drug testing  7 drug trade  59 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  68 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  23 eradication  128 essential medicines  25 estonia  1 eswatini  7 european drug policy  93 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  95 fair trade  15 fentanyl  80 france  114 fumigation  26 gateway theory  29 georgia  3 germany  193 ghana  18 global commission  46 greece  19 guatemala  31 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  340 hemp  42 heroin  139 heroin assisted treatment  79 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  107 honduras  3 human rights  254 ICC  1 illinois  10 incarceration  52 INCB  139 india  95 indigenous rights  1 indonesia  35 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  15 iran  14 ireland  15 israel  63 italy  42 jamaica  172 japan  3 kava  3 kazakhstan  5 ketamine  27 khat  36 kratom  31 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  412 lebanon  43 legal highs  63 legalization  1615 lesotho  9 local customization  9 luxembourg  48 malaysia  7 malta  44 medical cannabis  651 mental health  44 methamphetamine  48 mexico  210 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  41 money laundering  54 morocco  122 naloxone  15 nepal  7 netherlands  323 new york  32 new zealand  67 NIDA  5 nitrous oxide  7 norway  18 NPS  10 opinion polls  130 opioids  149 opium  94 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  24 peru  44 peyote  3 philippines  89 pilot project  118 pleasure  5 poland  2 police pacification  18 portugal  68 potency  2 precursors  6 prevention  3 prison situation  100 producers  147 prohibition  148 proportionality  110 psychedelics  13 psychosis  53 puerto rico  3 racism  29 reclassification  118 recriminalisation  36 regulation  1351 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  32 safer crack  29 scheduling  27 scientific research  141 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  66 singapore  6 social justice  77 south africa  77 spain  79 st lucia  9 st vincent and grenadines  31 substance-use disorder  18 substitution treatment  31 sweden  28 switzerland  147 synthetic cannabinoids  30 taxation  52 teen use  43 thailand  69 thresholds  57 tobacco industry  17 tramadol  17 treatment  27 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  14 UK  276 UN Common Position  1 UN drug control  438 UNGASS  58 UNODC  110 uruguay  145 US drug policy  1178 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  132 WHO  62 world drug report  11

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2016 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf