• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

SCOPE: Proposal by the UNDCP, 1 December 1997

FOR PARTICIPANTS ONLY
E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.11
1 December 1997
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

FOR COMMISSION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS ACTING AS PREPARATORY BODY FOR THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DEVOTED TO THE FIGHT AGAINST THE ILLICIT PRODUCTION, SALE, DEMAND, TRAFFIC AND DISTRIBUTION OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES

Third informal open-ended inter-sessional meeting
Vienna, 5 December 1997
Item 2 of the provisional agenda*

ERADICATION OF ILLICIT NARCOTIC CROPS
AND PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

A Global Plan for the Elimination of Illicit Narcotic Crops

PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL DRUG CONTROL PROGRAMME (UNDCP)**

* E/CN.7/1997/PC/8.
** This document has not been edited.
V.97-28725


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.11
Page 2

Introduction and Action Required by the Commission

1. To assist Member States in reducing the illicit supply of narcotic drugs, in compliance with their obligations under the international drug control treaties, the United Nations international Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) has developed a global plan for the elimination of illicit narcotic crops, which is annexed herewith. The plan takes into consideration the lessons and experience which the Programme has acquired from its activities in the field of alternative development. lt will draw on the experience and support of Governments, bilateral and multilateral assistance, and intergovernmental organizations.

2.The outline of the global plan is being brought to the attention of the third informal openended inter-sessional meeting of the Commission for information. The meeting is invited to propose that the Commission, at its next meeting in its capacity as preparatory body for the Special Session of the General Assembly, approve the plan and recommend its endorsement by the General Assembly at its Special Session in June 1998.


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.11
Page 3
Annex

A Global Plan for the Elimination of Illicit Narcotic Crops

A. The issue

1. During the past 25 years, the United Nations has guided international efforts to eliminate the illicit cultivation of the opium poppy in South-East and South-West Asia. Twelve years ago, a similar initiative was launched in the Andean region to eradicate the coca bush. Some landmark achievements have been made, particularly by the Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, Thailand and Turkey, in eliminating the illicit cultivation of the opium poppy which is currently concentrated in two countries: Afghanistan and Myanmar. Trends of the cultivation of the coca bush have remained stable with Bolivia, Colombia and Peru, accounting for 98% of production.

B. Outcome of past efforts

2.Past initiatives to eradicate illicit narcotic plants have met with mitigated success, with no large scale impact on the illicit supply of narcotic drugs, particularly heroin and cocaine. This resulted partly from the outcome of the absence of a comprehensive global strategy founded on the full-fledged commitment of the donor community and recipient countries, and the unfavourable political conditions which prevailed during the Cold War era.

C. The Global Plan: Its objectives and approach

3.The proposal for a global plan for the elimination of narcotic plants was endorsed by the Secretary-General and the Senior Management Group, i.e. the Cabinet of the United Nations, on 12 November 1997. The objective of this United Nations plan is to eliminate illicit cultivation of the opium poppy and the coca bush worldwide, as an important component of the drug control strategy of UNDCP, based on a balanced approach. While the main objective of the plan is to reduce the illicit supply of opiates, particularly heroin and cocaine, the package of measures envisaged will address other related aspects of drug control, particularly the suppression of illicit traffic, and demand reduction. Demand reduction strategies covering prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of drug abusers, will be an important part of the plan.

D. A fresh global approach to eradicate narcotic crops

4.The launching of the global plan is based on a constellation of favorable factors:

  • First the plan will build on the experience gained and the lessons learned from the various initiatives to eliminate illicit narcotic crop cultivation. Past policies and programmes have provided improved knowledge and understanding of the dynamics of alternative development and other associated measures, such as law enforcement and institution-building. As a first step in formulating the global plan, UNDCP will undertake a study to evaluate the success of efforts to reduce illicit cultivation during the past ten years. The field experience of the United Nations International Drug Control Programme in alternative development and its location in the key

E/CN.7/1997/PC/CPR.11
Page 4

  • countries affected by illicit cultivation, puts it in a unique position to play a catalytic and coordinating role in mounting this global plan in collaboration with Member States, the United Nations system and interested organizations, such as the financial institutions.
  • Second, the plan is being initiated at a time when Governments are committed to eliminating illicit cultivation. This is reflected in the adoption of article 14 in the 1988 Convention and the recurrent requests of the General Assembly, since the establishment of UNDCP, for increased priority to be given to alternative development with the objective of eliminating illicit drug production. In recognition of the collective responsibility of all Governments to counter the drug problem, the donor community has shown strong support for alternative development, viewing rural development as a means to counter the drug economy. Several recipient countries affected by illicit cultivation have invested considerable resources in their efforts to sustain alternative development. An important recent trend has been the pledges of the international financial institutions, particularly the regional development banks, such as the Inter-American Development Bank, to assist concerned Governments in alternative development programmes.
  • Third the plan's global approach will avoid the fragmentation which characterized previous initiatives to eliminate illicit cultivation. These were often conceived as isolated technical assistance projects targeting specific local situations without an overarching plan to address the problem in a comprehensive manner. The objective of the plan is to provide the critical mass required to make an impact on the situation at the local, national, regional-and global levels. Our experience, as demonstrated in Pakistan and Thailand, is that whenever a critical mass has been provided, along with the strong political support of Governments, illicit cultivation was eliminated.
  • Fourth, the global plan will cover the displacement effects, an issue which was too often neglected in previous initiatives to reduce illicit cultivation. This is essential in order to ensure that success in eliminating illicit cultivation in a targeted part of a country would not contribute to the displacement of cultivation to other parts.
  • Fifth, a system to monitor the extent of illicit cultivation will be established. This will enable an on-going assessment of the impact of eradication efforts and the monitoring of the possible displacement of illicit cultivation. Several Governments and commercial enterprises have proposed the use of their remote sensing technology and services to monitor the application of programmes to eliminate narcotic crops. The use of remote sensing technology, which overcomes the legal obstacles traditionally associated with overflight and the security of aircraft, will facilitate the monitoring of illicit narcotic crops. As appropriate, remote sensing capacity will be combined with ground surveys', to replicate the positive experience of UNDCP in the survey of illicit poppy cultivation in Afghanistan.
  • Sixth, the international community has a proven methodology which has evolved from our field experience in initiatives to eradicate illicit cultivation of the opium poppy and the coca bush. During the 1970s and 1980s the approach evolved from (i) eradication by force or through compensatory schemes, to (ii) crop substitution, premised on the belief that removing the economic incentives to grow illicit crops would lead to their replacement, to (iii) alternative development. That is, integrated rural development centred on the elimination of illicit crops through income-

E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.11
Page 5

  • generating activities, and improving the overall quality of life of the target population through the provision of education, infrastructure and social services.

E. Factors influencing successful application of the Global Plan

5. While the elaboration of the global plan rests on a unique combination of favorable factors and circumstances, its successful application will depend on a series of factors, which includes the following:

  • A long term financial and political commitment by national and local authorities to initiatives targeting illicit cultivation. The active involvement of local groups and communities in the design and development of alternative development programmes is also required in order to ensure ownership of the programmes by the targeted local communities.
  • The provision of a coordinated programma of technical assistance based on a clear division of labour. UNDCP would play its catalytical role and focus on the drug control objectives, and other programmes of the UN system, the international financial institutions, multilateral and bilateral agencies, would direct their efforts to the integrated development objectives, particularly the reduction of rural poverty through income generating activities.
  • The incorporation of demand reduction components (prevention, treatment and rehabilitation) in alternative development programmes, in line with the identified priorities of local communities.
  • As alternative development is a long-term objective its success will depend on favorable conditions, particularly the commitment to enforce agreements or arrangements between concerned parties to eliminate illicit cultivation. This would entail the successful blending of alternative development initiatives with law enforcement measures to provide a credible deterrent. The main challenges at the local level will include the strict application of existing legislation and arrangements, with due respect to human rights, and resisting the corrupting influences of drug trafficking networks.
  • The effectiveness of monitoring systems to measure the extent of illicit cultivation, progress in eradication, and the displacement effect of illicit cultivation, if any.

F. Conclusion

6. The Programme's strategy, aimed at reaching the target of eliminating illicit cultivation of the coca bush and opium poppy world-wide, will require careful planning and a flexible approach. lt is an ambitious initiative, combining alternative development, a monitoring capacity, law enforcement action and demand reduction programmes. Given the commitment of Member States, the United Nations and civil society to drug control, it remains a viable target for the twenty-first century.


  • Labels
    1998 UNGASS | eradication | opium | cannabis | coca

Drugs in the News

  • Controlled cannabis sale in Zurich greenlighted
    22.03.2023
  • Malawi cannabis: Farmers' high hopes fail to materialise
    22.03.2023
  • Raphael Mechoulam, ‘Father of Cannabis Research,’ dies at 92
    22.03.2023
  • Australia spends billions ‘failing to police’ cannabis that earns black market $25bn a year, Greens say
    17.03.2023
  • Legal cannabis plans breach international law – State Council
    16.03.2023
  • These are the rules cannabis associations will have to follow
    15.03.2023
More news

Weblog

    Germany: Flirting with Plan B?Germany: Flirting with Plan B?
    07.12.2022
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  36 afghanistan  25 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  36 afghanistan  25 hide
africa  13 albania  14 alternative development  120 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  88 amsterdam  29 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  104 austria  5 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  48 barbados  11 belgium  43 belize  10 bermuda  15 bhang  14 bolivia  117 brazil  93 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  45 california  213 cambodia  12 canada  529 cannabinoids  104 cannabis  3142 cannabis clubs  212 cannabis industry  402 caribbean  148 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  129 coca  217 cocaine  87 coffee shop  226 cognitive decline  30 colombia  157 colorado  162 compulsary detention  19 conflict  4 conventions  271 corporate capture  54 corruption  4 costa rica  10 crack  54 craft cannabis  30 crime  84 czech republic  41 dark net  4 death penalty  2 decertification  1 decriminalization  911 deforestation  10 denmark  123 drug checking  41 drug consumption rooms  193 drug courts  22 drug markets  143 drug policy index  2 drug testing  7 drug trade  59 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  68 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  24 eradication  129 essential medicines  25 estonia  1 eswatini  7 european drug policy  98 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  95 fair trade  16 fentanyl  80 france  114 fumigation  27 gateway theory  29 georgia  3 germany  197 ghana  18 global commission  46 greece  19 guatemala  31 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  341 hemp  42 heroin  139 heroin assisted treatment  80 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  108 honduras  3 human rights  255 ICC  1 illinois  10 incarceration  52 INCB  140 india  97 indigenous rights  1 indonesia  35 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  16 iran  14 ireland  15 israel  63 italy  42 jamaica  173 japan  3 kava  3 kazakhstan  5 ketamine  27 khat  36 kratom  31 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  414 lebanon  43 legal highs  63 legalization  1629 lesotho  10 local customization  9 luxembourg  49 malawi  4 malaysia  7 malta  48 medical cannabis  654 mental health  44 methamphetamine  48 mexico  210 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  41 money laundering  54 morocco  123 naloxone  16 nepal  7 netherlands  326 new york  33 new zealand  67 NIDA  5 nitrous oxide  7 norway  18 NPS  10 opinion polls  130 opioids  150 opium  94 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  24 peru  45 peyote  3 philippines  89 pilot project  120 pleasure  5 poland  2 police pacification  18 portugal  68 potency  2 precursors  7 prevention  3 prison situation  100 prohibition  150 proportionality  110 psychedelics  13 psychosis  55 puerto rico  3 racism  29 reclassification  118 recriminalisation  36 regulation  1367 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  32 safer crack  29 scheduling  27 scientific research  144 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  67 singapore  6 social justice  78 south africa  79 spain  79 st lucia  9 st vincent and grenadines  31 substance-use disorder  18 substitution treatment  31 sweden  28 switzerland  148 synthetic cannabinoids  30 taxation  52 teen use  43 thailand  69 thresholds  57 tobacco industry  17 traditional growers  150 tramadol  17 treatment  28 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  14 UK  276 UN Common Position  1 UN drug control  439 UNGASS  58 UNODC  110 uruguay  145 US drug policy  1180 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  132 WHO  62 world drug report  11

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2016 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf