• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

Fact Sheet: Coca leaf and the UN Drugs Conventions

10 Facts about the Cocal Leaf and the UN Drugs Conventions

factsheet-cocaapplication-pdfVersion in PDF

1. An ECOSOC mandated study published in 1950 as the Report of the Commission of Enquiry on the Coca Leaf, recommends to suppress “the harmful habit of chewing coca” within a few years;

2. In 1952 the WHO Expert Committee on Drugs Liable to Produce Addiction concluded that “coca chewing comes so close to the characteristics of addiction ... that it must be defined and treated as an addiction” and advised this to the Commission on Narcotic Drugs.

3. Coca, together with cannabis and opium, became one of the main control targets of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, including special restrictions on cultivation, proscribing the phasing out of traditional use within 25 years and listing the coca leaf as “a substance liable for abuse” in Schedule 1;

4. The 1988 Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances forced states to criminalize coca, under article 3, paragraph 2: “Subject to its constitutional principles and the basic concepts of its legal system, each Party shall adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish as a criminal offence under its domestic law,when committed intentionally, the possession, purchase or cultivation of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances for personal consumption contrary to the provisions of the 1961 Convention, the 1961Convention as amended or the 1971 Convention”, but it also makes an exemption for traditional use; Article 14 states: “Each Party shall take appropriate measures to prevent illicit cultivation of and to eradicate plants containing narcotic or psychotropic substances, such as opium poppy, coca bush and cannabis plants, cultivated illicitly in its territory”, but then continues saying that the “measures adopted shall respect fundamental human rights and shall take due account of traditional licit uses, where there is historic evidence of such use”. One official reservation was made, only by Bolivia, upon signing and confirmed upon ratification of this Convention to preserve the right to use coca leaf for traditional purposes.

5. The INCB annual report for 1994 stressed that: “The conflict between the provisions of the 1961 Convention and the views and legislation of countries where the use of the coca leaf is legal should be solved. There is a need to undertake a scientific review to assess the coca-chewing habit and the drinking of coca tea.” A supplement to the 1994 report dedicated one section to ‘Coca leaf: a need to clarify ambiguities’, calling for ”a need to examine the situation regarding State parties to the 1961 Convention that have made reservations under article 49 of that Convention. A true assessment of the habit of coca leaf chewing is urgently called for”.

6. In 1995 the WHO finished “the largest global study on cocaine use”, including one part on the use of coca leaf, concluding that "the use of coca leaves appears to have no negative health effects and has positive therapeutic, sacred and social functions for indigenous Andean populations", apparently one of the reasons the study was obstructed in a peer review process, and never published.

7. In September 2007 the UN adopts the Universal Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, reflecting a global commitment to respect cultural traditions and medicinal practices of all indigenous populations. This recognition reflects a clear contradiction in international law regarding the legal status of traditional use of coca.

8. The government of Bolivia proposed to amend the 1961 Single Convention in March 2009, by removing two sub paragraphs of article 49 that bans coca leaf chewing. A US-led coalition presented objections within the 12 months period established by the procedure, and blocked the amendment.

9. In July 2011 Bolivia denounced the 1961 Single Convention, which came into effect in January 2012. Bolivia will reaccede the treaty on the 10 th of January 2013 with a new reservation that will only enter into force if two third of all parties to the Convention do not express objections. Whether Bolivia would decide to still reaccede in the unlikely case that the reservation is not accepted, remains to be seen.

10. In February 2012 Bolivia responded to the INCB annual report for 2011 preface, in which it was accused of threatening the integrity of the entire international drug control regime by using the rarely used but legitimate procedure of treaty denunciation and reaccession with a reservation to defend traditional uses of the coca leaf.

Updated until September 2012

  • Labels
    WHO | conventions | coca | INCB | UN drug control

Drugs in the News

  • Senate Democrats roll out long-awaited bill to legalize marijuana
    21.07.2022
  • Council of State opposes plan to ban sale of laughing gas
    18.07.2022
  • Brussels Mayor: ‘Police repression does not work, decriminalise cannabis now’
    18.07.2022
  • Luxembourg leads the charge for a new European drug policy
    17.07.2022
  • Results of cultivated cannabis experiment won't be ready in 2024: Ministers
    08.07.2022
  • Hundreds of thousands of Canadians could see their drug possession records disappear
    04.07.2022
More news

Weblog

    Statement on the UN Common Position and Task TeamStatement on the UN Common Position and Task Team
    15.04.2021
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  33 afghanistan  24 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  33 afghanistan  24 hide
africa  11 albania  13 alternative development  118 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  84 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  98 austria  5 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  45 barbados  11 belgium  37 belize  10 bermuda  12 bolivia  115 brazil  93 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  44 california  209 cambodia  12 canada  522 cannabinoids  95 cannabis  3023 cannabis clubs  198 cannabis industry  393 caribbean  146 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  129 coca  214 cocaine  71 coffee shop  220 cognitive decline  30 colombia  150 colorado  161 compulsary detention  19 conflict  4 conventions  255 corporate capture  49 corruption  4 costa rica  10 crack  54 craft cannabis  30 crime  78 czech republic  31 dark net  4 death penalty  2 decertification  1 decriminalization  889 deforestation  8 denmark  122 drug checking  40 drug consumption rooms  191 drug courts  22 drug markets  140 drug policy index  2 drug testing  7 drug trade  52 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  65 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  21 eradication  127 essential medicines  25 estonia  1 eswatini  7 european drug policy  83 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  95 fair trade  15 fentanyl  79 france  111 fumigation  25 gateway theory  29 georgia  3 germany  176 ghana  18 global commission  46 greece  19 guatemala  31 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  338 hemp  40 heroin  134 heroin assisted treatment  79 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  101 honduras  3 human rights  253 ICC  1 illinois  10 incarceration  52 INCB  138 india  94 indigenous rights  1 indonesia  35 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  14 iran  14 ireland  15 israel  63 italy  42 jamaica  170 japan  3 kava  3 kazakhstan  5 ketamine  27 khat  36 kratom  31 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  407 lebanon  43 legal highs  63 legalization  1539 lesotho  9 local customization  8 luxembourg  45 malaysia  7 malta  37 medical cannabis  640 mental health  44 methamphetamine  46 mexico  209 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  41 money laundering  54 morocco  119 naloxone  15 nepal  7 netherlands  312 new york  28 new zealand  67 NIDA  5 nitrous oxide  7 norway  18 NPS  10 opinion polls  126 opioids  147 opium  93 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  23 peru  42 peyote  3 philippines  89 pleasure  5 police pacification  18 portugal  68 potency  2 precursors  6 prevention  3 prison situation  100 producers  140 prohibition  144 proportionality  110 psychedelics  13 psychosis  53 puerto rico  3 racism  29 reclassification  117 recriminalisation  36 regulation  1292 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  30 safer crack  29 scheduling  27 scientific research  141 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  66 singapore  6 social justice  74 south africa  73 spain  79 st lucia  9 st vincent and grenadines  31 substance-use disorder  18 substitution treatment  31 sweden  28 switzerland  144 synthetic cannabinoids  30 taxation  48 teen use  43 thailand  64 thresholds  54 tobacco industry  17 tramadol  17 treatment  27 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  14 UK  270 UN Common Position  1 UN drug control  429 UNGASS  58 UNODC  110 uruguay  144 US drug policy  1165 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  131 WHO  62 world drug report  11

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2016 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf