• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

CND note, 23 October 1997

Note by the Secretariat of the CND, 23 October 1997 

COMMISSION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS ACTING AS PREPARATORY BODY FOR THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DEVOTED TO THE FIGHT AGAINST THE ILLICIT PRODUCTION, SALE, DEMAND, TRAFFIC AND DISTRIBUTION OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES

Third informal open-ended inter-sessional meeting
Vienna, 5 December 1997
Item 2 of the provisional agenda*

ERADICATION OF ILLICIT NARCOTIC CROPS
AND PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

Contents

  1. Development of a Global Strategy for the Elimination of Illicit Crops
  2. Increased Cooperation in Alternative Development
  3. Providing Accurate Information on Illicit Crop Cultivation
  4. Strengthening the Drug Control System Through Institution-building
  5. Improved Information about Alternative Development Results
  6. Finding Safe Means of Eradication

*E/CN.711997/PC/8.
V.97-27490T


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.8

Page 2

I. Development of a Global Strategy for the Elimination of Illicit Crops

Problem

1. The United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) and its predecessor bodies have accumulated a large corpus of knowledge and operational experience in the area of reduction of illicit crops. Illicit crop eradication, crop substitution and alternative development have been adopted as strategies to reduce illicit drug supply in countries in which drug crops are illicitly produced. The reduction or elimination of illicit drug crops in areas in which UNDCP and Governments and bilateral development institutions have intervened has not led to an overall reduction of areas under illicit crop cultivation, as new or non-traditional production areas have replaced old or traditional ones.

2. No comprehensive attempt has been made yet to conceptualize principles and modalities required to address this problem at the global level. And no time-frame has been defined and no estimation has been made of the resources needed to make attainment of this objective possible.

Action

3. UNDCP therefore intends to formulate a global strategy to eliminate the illicit cultivation of drug crops, focusing on the coca bush and the opium poppy. The strategy will build on the experience in alternative development projects accumulated by Governments, bilateral and multilateral institutions and UNDCP and will include a comprehensive proposal for action. The progress on the strategy will be reported to the General Assembly at its special session on drug control that is to be held in 1998.

II. Increased Cooperation in Alternative Development

Problem

4. Although an increase in cooperation has taken place in the last decade as exemplified by alternative development projects, the coordination of planning and resource allocation at the national and international levels can be improved. The long-term economic and political necessity for Governments to integrate such areas of illicit crop cultivation needs to be linked to overall national development planning and to increased commitment both to national drug control plans and to national economic and agricultural development plans.

Action

5. UNDCP should continue its cooperation with other United Nations entities working in rural development, following examples of successful interaction with relevant United Nations organizations in Asia and Latin America.

6. International financial institutions should seek the coordination of internationally assisted national development plans in order to incorporate alternative development measures at the national and international levels.

7. A sustainable economic environment should be provided at the national and international levels to facilitate the presence of market forces that make illicit crop cultivation less attractive. From an international perspective, trade arrangements and concessions offering increased access of agricultural exports to international markets should contribute to resolving price and marketing problems associated with substituting legal cash crops for illicit crops.


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.8

Page 3

8. Alternative development has been shown to be most successful where there is political will on the part of the Governments concerned to make it a priority. Governments should renew their commitment to effective alternative development programmes by systematically incorporating areas under illicit crop cultivation into national development plans, including those involving international assistance, and by increasing government capacity to design, implement and monitor alternative development measures.

III. Providing Accurate Information on Illicit Crop Cultivation

Problem

9. Both the Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Outline of Future Activities in Drug Abuse Control and the Global Programme of Action adopted by the General Assembly at its seventeenth special session refer to the need to identify illicit crop cultivation and this need has been subsequently recognized by the Commission on Narcotic Drugs in its resolutions. While UNDCP has undertaken a number of initiatives to increase its information on illicit crop cultivation, they have been ad hoc initiatives of a limited scale, designed to meet specific requirements.

Action

10. UNDCP should establish a database to provide annual data on the global cultivation of illicit crops, starting with key areas of production and relying on its own, government and other bilateral sources.

11. Member States should provide information through the annual reports questionnaire and by other means on the extent of illicit crop cultivation and eradication.

12. UNDCP should provide Member States with technical support on methods of data collection and monitoring, ensuring that the technology used and the methodology followed are appropriate to the circumstances in each Member State.

IV. Strengthening the Drug Control System Through Institution-Builidng

Problem

13. As the international repository for alternative development measures, UNDCP has been relied on by Member States for guidance and funding regarding alternative development. Governments need to develop, and increasingly rely on, their own capacities as UNDCP will be focusing increasingly on measures to support capacity-building and institution-building.

Action

14. The direct involvement of Member States in the design, planning and implementation of alternative development measures should be increased, enabling Member States to profit from the experience of UNDCP in alternative development.

15. Member States in which illicit crop cultivation occurs should increase their efforts to build institutions capable of managing alternative development projects and programmes as part of integrated national development programmes, with support from UNDCP.

16. Through community-based approaches and supportive, broadly focused development measures, UNDCP should provide technical assistance for institution-building at the local, national and regional levels.


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.8

Page 4

17. Emphasis should be placed on community-based approaches to natural resource management in sustainable production systems, approaches consistent with participatory, people-centred methods of development that rely on the knowledge, skills, interests and needs of the local population as a basis for appropriate intervention. This approach is especially important for alternative development given the sociocultural dimensions of illicit crop cultivation.

V. Improved Information about Alternative Development Results

Problem

18. Due to the complex economic, social and political contexts, preventing, reducing and eliminating illicit crop cultivation through alternative development measures still pose a challenge despite the positive results achieved in most project areas. The process by which Governments and United Nations agencies learn needs to be strengthened. By improving the dissemination of results, the experience that they have accumulated could be of more benefit.

Action

19. UNDCP should improve the dissemination of the results of alternative development programmes and projects to Member States, other United Nations entities and the general public.

20. Member States should improve their international cooperation in the exchange of relevant information on alternative development policies and results.

VI. Finding Safe Means of Eradication

21. Pursuant to Economic and Social Council resolution E/1 988/9, annex, paragraph 11, an Expert Group Meeting on Environmentally Safe Methods for the Eradication of Illicit Narcotic Plants was held at Vienna from 4 to 8 December 1989. The Expert Group recommended the initiation of a comprehensive research and development programma to enable current technological developments to be put to practical use in the field and to assess the environmental impact of the proposed methods using modern approaches. A research programma for environmentally safe methods of eradicating illicit drug plants was drawn up and subsequently amended where necessary by a panel of experts convened by UNDCP at Vienna in November 1992 and, most recently, by a similar panel in September 1997.

Problem

22. The draft research programma dealing with the three principal narcotic plants (the coca bush, the opium poppy and cannabis) requires further input in order for the environmental impact of the proposed eradication methods to be assessed using modern approaches approved by the major international pesticide regulatory authorities.

Action

23. The main needs include:

(a) Extensive environmental impact studies focusing initially on those herbicides which are currently used for control of illicit narcotic plants and which may be required for use in other geographical regions;

(b) Identification of new herbicidal chemicals that are environmentally safe and effective in controlling narcotic plants in order to keep pace with the rapid advances in herbicide chemistry and to allow the timely


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.8

Page 5

adoption of any chemical offering the advantages of increased environmental safety, efficacy and economic efficiency;

(c) Identification of biological control methods appropriate to both the classical strategy (using agents that establish, multiply, spread and persist in the areas producing the illicit crops) and the microbial herbicide strategy (inundating each target plant with a pathogenic organism for that specific plant);

(d) Surveys and collections of alternative biological control agents to ensure continued availability of suitable agents, should any of the lead candidates be rejected as a result of new research findings or countermeasures implemented by traffickers of narcotic drugs;

(e) Taxonomic studies of the narcotic plants, especially the opium poppy and cannabis, using modern techniques of genetic fingerprinting, in order to establish the range of genetic variation present in populations in the producer countries.

24. Output of the research programma should be collated and distributed, in a suitable form, to interested Member States on a regular basis. When sufficient data are available, they should be published in recognized scientific publications and as United Nations handbooks of methods for the eradication of narcotic plants. These should include methods of assessing the environmental impact of the eradication methods. Eradication programmes will succeed only if support strategies, such as crop substitution or alternative development, are put in place at the same time.


Drugs in the News

  • Cannabis cafés and self-growing: Czechia presents draft of new marijuana law
    11.01.2024
  • Minister signs bill banning recreational use of weed
    08.01.2024
  • As the mayor of Amsterdam, I can see the Netherlands risks becoming a narco-state
    05.01.2024
  • Barcelona city council threatens to shut down cannabis social clubs
    04.01.2024
  • Swiss capital Bern considers legal cocaine project
    20.12.2023
  • High time: after five years, Dutch start legal cannabis trial
    15.12.2023
More news

Weblog

    Willful blindness: INCB can find nothing good to say on cannabis legalisation
    14.03.2023
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  38 afghanistan  25 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  38 afghanistan  25 hide
africa  14 albania  14 alternative development  120 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  89 amphetamine  1 amsterdam  30 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  109 austria  5 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  52 barbados  11 belgium  46 belize  10 bermuda  15 bhang  15 bolivia  118 brazil  95 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  45 california  216 cambodia  12 canada  543 cannabinoids  107 cannabis  3255 cannabis clubs  230 cannabis industry  417 caribbean  148 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  131 coca  220 cocaine  95 coffee shop  230 cognitive decline  30 colombia  160 colorado  163 compulsary detention  19 conflict  4 conventions  277 corporate capture  59 corruption  5 costa rica  10 crack  55 craft cannabis  31 crime  92 czech republic  54 dark net  4 death penalty  3 decertification  1 decriminalization  935 deforestation  11 denmark  132 drug checking  41 drug consumption rooms  193 drug courts  22 drug markets  147 drug policy index  2 drug testing  7 drug trade  60 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  70 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  38 eradication  129 essential medicines  25 estonia  2 eswatini  7 ethiopia  3 european drug policy  119 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  95 fair trade  16 fentanyl  84 france  119 fumigation  27 gateway theory  29 georgia  3 germany  217 ghana  18 global commission  46 greece  19 guatemala  32 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  348 hemp  44 heroin  139 heroin assisted treatment  80 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  124 honduras  4 human rights  259 ICC  1 illinois  10 incarceration  53 INCB  143 india  102 indigenous rights  1 indonesia  35 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  17 iran  14 ireland  16 israel  63 italy  42 jamaica  176 japan  3 kava  4 kazakhstan  5 kenya  11 ketamine  27 khat  37 kratom  33 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  432 lebanon  43 legal highs  64 legalization  1709 lesotho  10 local customization  11 luxembourg  60 malawi  4 malaysia  7 malta  58 medical cannabis  665 mental health  45 methamphetamine  49 mexico  211 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  46 money laundering  55 morocco  128 naloxone  16 nepal  7 netherlands  341 new york  34 new zealand  67 NIDA  5 nigeria  1 nitrous oxide  9 norway  18 NPS  10 opinion polls  132 opioids  153 opium  94 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  24 peru  45 peyote  3 philippines  89 pilot project  137 pleasure  5 poland  2 police pacification  18 portugal  68 potency  2 precursors  7 prevention  3 prison situation  101 prohibition  158 proportionality  110 psychedelics  13 psychosis  57 puerto rico  3 racism  29 reclassification  119 recriminalisation  42 regulation  1454 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  36 safer crack  29 scheduling  29 scientific research  145 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  67 singapore  7 social justice  83 somalia  7 south africa  83 spain  81 st lucia  9 st vincent and grenadines  31 substance-use disorder  20 substitution treatment  31 sweden  31 switzerland  162 synthetic cannabinoids  31 taxation  58 teen use  43 thailand  78 thresholds  64 tobacco industry  17 traditional growers  162 tramadol  17 treatment  29 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  14 UK  282 UN Common Position  1 UN drug control  444 UNGASS  58 UNODC  111 uruguay  146 US drug policy  1192 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  134 WHO  66 world drug report  11 yemen  6

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2024 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf